Monthly Archives: June 2022

. In Chapter 2, which is called History 101, the authors lay out 5 principles for weighing historical testimony. I list them here using my own paraphrase. Testimony is stronger when it is: Corroborated by multiple, independent witnesses Provided by someone neutral or even hostile to the benefiting parties […]

Going for the Jugular (Habermas & Licona post #9: Part ...

23 Jun, 2022 in Apologetics

“How could a loving God order the extermination of a whole city, even the babies? That seems like an evil thing to do.” I don’t remember the link, but I’ve heard the apologist Jeff Durbin respond to this type of question. Part of his response (especially to an atheist) is […]

A STUDENT OR AN ARBITER?

21 Jun, 2022 in Apologetics

. (This is my 4th and probably final post on Chapter 1) Yes, it’s possible, but… I wanted to comment on another section in Chapter 1 called “Proof does not aim at ‘absolute historical certainty'”. The authors clarify that if we demand absolute 100% proof for all historical claims, […]

Going for the Jugular (Habermas & Licona post #8: Part ...

20 Jun, 2022 in Apologetics

. (This is my 3rd post on Chapter 1) Although I disagree with the authors when they say you have to believe in Jesus in order to escape the fires of hell (see post #5 in series outline above), I heartily agree with their other comments about the importance […]

Going for the Jugular (Habermas & Licona post #7: Part ...

19 Jun, 2022 in Bible

. (This is my 2nd post on Chapter 1) In Chapter 1, the authors take on the claim that Jesus did not predict His resurrection. It’s indisputable that the gospels record such predictions (Mark 8:31, for example), so the question is whether those gospel records are authentic. The authors […]

Going for the Jugular (Habermas & Licona post #6: Part ...

11 Jun, 2022 in Apologetics