Going for the Jugular (Habermas & Licona post #9: Part 1) 1

 in Apologetics

 

Open series outline: Going for the jugular
 

.

In Chapter 2, which is called History 101, the authors lay out 5 principles for weighing historical testimony.

I list them here using my own paraphrase. Testimony is stronger when it is:

  1. Corroborated by multiple, independent witnesses
  2. Provided by someone neutral or even hostile to the benefiting parties
  3. Embarrassing to the person providing it
  4. Eyewitness rather than secondhand
  5. Provided closer to the time of the events in question

These principles seem reasonable to me; the more a piece of testimony meets the above criteria, the more justified we are in calling a narrative “historical”.

What do you think?

God bless,

TFOTF

**************************************************************************************************
CONTACT INFORMATION
Mailing list / Email:
If you want to be notified when there is a new post, just email me at gmail.com with subscribe in the subject. There will be a new post every week or so. What’s my gmail username? Good question, it is theformofthefourth. If you don’t want to subscribe but still want to contact me, please feel free!
Comments:
Comments are super easy! Most comments will immediately be posted. You can use a fake email address and name if you want, I don't mind at all. I just want to hear from you 🙂
RSS:
On the side of the screen (or the bottom, depending on what device you're using), look for the "Meta" heading. Under that heading, there is one link for the entries feed (meaning, all my blog posts), and another link for the comments feed. Tap the one you want, and then use an app like flipboard or podcast addict to subscribe. I don't know about all the choices out there, but I use Podcast Addict to keep a steady stream of audio podcasts and blog posts flowing into my phone.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

One thought on “Going for the Jugular (Habermas & Licona post #9: Part 1)”